The Difference Between a Court Award and a Personal Injury Settlement 

There are only two methods to receive insurance company money. A settlement is a voluntary payment. If the defendant in a personal injury lawsuit is sued, the insurance company will hire attorneys to defend him. If the case proceeds to trial and the plaintiff wins the case, the defendant must pay the plaintiff compensation, known as an award. 

In most circumstances, the insurance company pays the reward, but the insurance company and the defendant must pay the amount in other cases. You should consult a personal injury lawyer in Newburyport to learn more. 


Settlements and awards can be made at any time. After an injury, a settlement might be reached at any time. Settlements are frequently completed considerably faster than awards. Settlements are not suitable until the injured party has completed medical treatment, has been freed from medical care, and has fully comprehended the extent of the damages and ramifications of the accident. Therefore, minor injury claims can be resolved faster than major damage claims. Because the claim must be fought, awards are almost always delayed.

Suppose an insurance company provides an acceptable settlement amount before the plaintiff commences a lawsuit. In that instance, it may be desirable for the plaintiff to settle the lawsuit for that amount instead of waiting up to 18 months or longer for the prospect of collecting a larger settlement payment. Depending on the outcome of the case, the plaintiff may get a settlement that is less than the insurance company’s first offer.

A plaintiff may have to wait for as long as 18 months before their case is heard by a jury. The actual time frame is determined by the jurisdiction and facts of the case. As a result, settling the disagreement rather than waiting for a jury award would be better, everything else being equal.


You know how much you can obtain if you have a monetary amount on the table and your expert injury attorney has convinced the insurance company to pay their maximum. However, regardless of how skillfully the case is presented to a jury, the amount the jury may grant, if any, is unknown. So the risk is the difference here.

In some situations, a claimant may want to risk the money offered in return for the prospect of winning a much larger award. On the other hand, others say that a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush and that as long as an offer is reasonable, it may be worthwhile to settle the situation. However, remember that you should not make any significant decisions without the counsel of a legal professional. 

Leave a reply